Source and Attribution Policy
Summary: When a page depends on external reporting, official data, or first-party material, we aim to identify that source clearly and add value through explanation and organisation.
1. Source Preference
Where possible, we prefer original reporting, official statements, public records, direct documents, and first-party datasets.
If those are not available, we may rely on credible secondary reporting, but we still aim to make the source relationship clear.
2. How Attribution Appears on the Site
On source-backed pages, we aim to name the publisher or source and link to the original item when a public URL exists.
- Publisher name where available
- Source link where available
- Date signals where relevant
- A clear distinction between source material and added explanation
3. What We Avoid
We do not aim to republish full articles or large portions of third-party reporting. If a page depends too heavily on outside material without enough added value, it should be revised or removed.
4. When Source Confidence Is Weak
If sourcing looks unreliable, incomplete, or contradictory, we may delay publication, simplify the claim, revise the page later, or remove it entirely.
5. Source Questions
If you believe a source is missing, misattributed, or linked incorrectly, contact us via Contact Us with the page URL and the correction you think is needed.